[Our Fake History] Episode #87- Was There a Real King Arthur? (Part III)

Episode #87- Was There a Real King Arthur? (Part III)

08/05/2019 by Sebastian Major

Web player: http://podplayer.net/?id=70277430
Episode: http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/ourfakehistory/Episode_87_-_Was_there_a_Real_King_Arthur-_Part_III.mp3?dest-id=367678

There is evidence out there that King Arthur was more than just a myth. However, that evidence often comes in the form of tiny scraps found in questionable sources. Those bits of evidence can be arranged and interpreted in a variety of different ways. As a result there are a plethora of plausible theories about the identity of the historical King Arthur. Which of these theories offers the best explanation for the legendary king’s true identity? Tune in and find out how the last of the Romans, savage tongues, and some dude named the Venerable Bede all play a role in the story.

Listen Date: 2019-05-27

Notes:

  • Back to actual historical analysis; and this time it was more the vast number of posited origin stories for Arthur
  • None of them are actually individually that interesting, except for the proud nationalistic theory that Arthur was Scottish.
  • However, as a general point, the suggestion that Arthur was from Brittany rather than Britain; and that Celtic Wales was closer to Celtic Brittany by ship than to England overland was one of those things which you don’t realise until it’s pointed out to you.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s